Wolfoo Videos Ordered Removed Over Peppa Pig Audio
A High Court judge ruled that the animated character's content illegally copied sound clips from the popular children's show.
Trust 42Craft 55Hype 15How this was reported ▾
Single named source with direct quotes and official ruling cited.
How well corroborated and evidenced the reporting is. Higher is better.
Clear separation of facts and quotes, but no opposing view beyond SConnect.
Context, balance and separation of fact from comment. Higher is better.
Headline accurately reflects the ruling's scope.
How far presentation runs ahead of substance. Lower is better.
1 source assessed · methodology
Animated character Wolfoo's videos are to be removed from platforms including YouTube after a High Court judge ruled they illegally copied audio from Peppa Pig. The decision follows a copyright infringement case brought by entertainment giant Hasbro, which owns the rights to Peppa Pig.
Copyright Infringement Ruling
Sunseeker Holiday Homes enters administration
The Hull-based manufacturer, founded in 2019, has appointed administrators, putting 76 jobs at risk.
Mr Justice Smith stated that the copying of audio clips, including sounds made by Peppa and her family, was "prolific" and "long-standing". The judge found that all 92 English-language Wolfoo videos examined contained copied audio. Approximately 75% of foreign-language videos examined also featured such clips. Hasbro and Peppa Pig's creators initially took legal action in London in 2022, claiming SConnect, Wolfoo's makers, attempted to deceive young viewers into believing Wolfoo was connected to Peppa Pig.
SConnect denied the infringement claim but admitted that some videos created before mid-2020 contained Peppa Pig audio. The company stated this was due to an independent third-party contractor using clips without their knowledge. SConnect also claimed that all infringing videos were removed and that newer animations used exclusively in-house created sounds.
However, the judge dismissed SConnect's arguments, deeming the source of the sounds irrelevant. He noted that while many infringing videos were taken down, some were simply moved to different channels. The judge also stated that the claim of exclusively new sounds being used could be disproved. The ruling mandates the removal of all Wolfoo videos by 16:00 BST on Monday.
Enfield Town Liveable Neighbourhood scheme paused pending review
Transport for London funding for next phase is on hold as council re-evaluates project elements.
Global Application of Ruling
SConnect argued that the ruling should only apply to the sampled videos and that the scope was too broad. The judge rejected these points, confirming the order applies globally, encompassing the UK, the European Union, and all 166 World Trade Organisation member states, including the USA and Vietnam. Andrew Lee, partner at law firm Brandsmiths, which represented Hasbro, described the judgment as "significant" and noted it allows for brand protection in one forum rather than requiring actions in multiple countries.
Questions this report answers
+What did the High Court judge order?
The High Court judge ordered the removal of all Wolfoo videos from online platforms globally. This applies to the UK, EU, USA, and Vietnam, with a deadline of 16:00 BST on Monday for compliance.
+Why were Wolfoo videos ordered to be removed?
The videos were ordered removed because they illegally copied audio clips from Peppa Pig, including sounds made by Peppa and her family. The judge found this copying was prolific and long-standing across 92 English-language videos.
+Who brought the copyright infringement case against Wolfoo?
Hasbro, the owner of Peppa Pig, brought the copyright infringement case against Wolfoo's makers, SConnect. The legal action began in London in 2022, claiming deception of young viewers.
+Did SConnect admit to using Peppa Pig audio?
SConnect admitted some videos created before mid-2020 contained Peppa Pig audio due to an independent contractor's actions. However, the judge dismissed this defence, ruling all Wolfoo videos must be removed regardless.
Barnet Press News Desk
This article was written at the Barnet Press news desk from the reporting of the outlets listed below it. Drafting is done by a language model under human editorial supervision — there is no reporter behind this byline, and we would rather say so than invent one.
How stories are produced and scoredWho runs Barnet PressCorrections
Barnet conditions
Loading live conditions…