Ashwani Kumar wins unfair dismissal case over fake payslips
An employment tribunal ruled in favour of a former manager who discovered his payslips were fraudulent and tax was not paid to HMRC.
Trust 42Craft 55Hype 65How this was reported ▾
Single source, no named independent corroboration or official document cited.
How well corroborated and evidenced the reporting is. Higher is better.
No affected parties or responsible bodies quoted beyond the claimant.
Context, balance and separation of fact from comment. Higher is better.
Headline sensationalises a niche employment dispute beyond substance.
How far presentation runs ahead of substance. Lower is better.
1 source assessed · methodology
Ashwani Kumar, who managed a Papa John's branch in Harlow, Essex, has successfully sued his former employers for automatic unfair dismissal. The dispute arose after Mr. Kumar insisted on receiving official payslips and having his tax and National Insurance contributions lawfully paid to HMRC. He later discovered the payslips provided were not genuine and the deducted tax was never submitted to the authorities.
Confrontation Over Payment Terms

UKHSA issues amber heat health alerts for London and three regions until 31 July
Temperatures may reach 35°C on Monday, increasing pressure on the NHS and vulnerable residents
The conflict escalated on January 25, 2025, when Mr. Kumar returned from holiday to find he had no work at the Harlow store. Management offered him a position at a different location but stipulated he must accept cash-in-hand payments. Mr. Kumar had previously refused an offer to work for £7.50 an hour on a cash-in-hand basis, instead requesting proper documentation to ensure tax compliance.
When Mr. Kumar refused the illicit payment terms and insisted on continuing his employment under lawful conditions, his employers summoned the police to remove him from the premises. Officers stated they could not intervene as management claimed he was no longer an employee, but they advised him to pursue an Employment Tribunal claim.
Tribunal Ruling and Company Response

London mayoral poll: Policing experience boosts Tory chances in 2028
Opinium survey finds 52% of Londoners more likely to back Conservative candidate with crime-fighting background
The East London Employment Tribunal heard that issues with payment practices had been ongoing since Mr. Kumar started his employment in February 2023. The company also failed to provide any holiday pay during his two-year tenure, incorrectly claiming he was not entitled to it. He was also not compensated for the busy December 2024 holiday period, resulting in a shortfall of £2,040.39 in net wages.
In a judgment published in July 2026, Employment Judge Jones ruled entirely in Mr. Kumar's favour. The judge determined that Mr. Kumar had been subjected to automatic unfair dismissal because he asserted his statutory rights regarding payslips, lawful tax deductions, and paid holiday. The respondents, EEM London Ltd, EEM Holdings Ltd, and owner Abdul Sattar Askar, failed to attend the tribunal hearing and did not submit any original defence documents.
The tribunal also found the respondents liable for unauthorised wage deductions and failure to pay notice pay. A future hearing will determine the exact financial compensation Mr. Kumar is owed. Papa John's stated to MyLondon that they take the tribunal's findings seriously, noting the case relates to an independently owned franchise. The company indicated they are taking steps to challenge the judgment.
Questions this report answers
+What did the tribunal decide about Ashwani Kumar's case?
The East London Employment Tribunal ruled entirely in Ashwani Kumar's favour in July 2026, finding he was unfairly dismissed for asserting his statutory rights regarding payslips, tax compliance, and holiday pay. The judge confirmed automatic unfair dismissal due to his employer's failure to meet legal obligations.
+Why was Ashwani Kumar dismissed from Papa John's?
Kumar was dismissed after refusing to accept cash-in-hand payments and insisting on proper payslips and tax compliance. Management offered him a new role under illicit terms, but he refused, leading to his removal from the Harlow store on January 25, 2025.
+What unpaid wages was Ashwani Kumar owed?
The tribunal found Ashwani Kumar was owed £2,040.39 in net wages for the busy December 2024 period, holiday pay during his two-year employment, and notice pay. The exact compensation will be determined at a future hearing.
Barnet Press News Desk
This article was written at the Barnet Press news desk from the reporting of the outlets listed below it. Drafting is done by a language model under human editorial supervision — there is no reporter behind this byline, and we would rather say so than invent one.
How stories are produced and scoredWho runs Barnet PressCorrections
Barnet conditions
Loading live conditions…
More Coverage in World

UKHSA issues amber heat health alerts for London and three regions until 31 July

London mayoral poll: Policing experience boosts Tory chances in 2028

Reform UK proposes Royal Navy Channel operation to return migrants to France



