Think-tank: London should share income and corporation tax
Centre for Cities proposes replacing central government grants with a new tax-sharing deal for City Hall.
Trust 60Craft 65Hype 20How this was reported ▾
The central claim is attributed to a named think-tank and analyst, with figures and a document cited.
How well corroborated and evidenced the reporting is. Higher is better.
The article explains the issue, quotes affected parties, and details the proposed next steps.
Context, balance and separation of fact from comment. Higher is better.
The language is measured, with a headline that accurately reflects the article's content.
How far presentation runs ahead of substance. Lower is better.
1 source assessed · methodology
Central government grants provided to mayoral authorities, such as the Greater London Authority, should be substituted with a combination of income and corporation tax sharing, according to a report by the Centre for Cities think-tank. Currently, London receives almost £5 billion in grants annually, with £2.16 billion allocated to the Greater London Authority, equating to £237 per resident.
Proposed Tax Sharing Mechanism
Barnet Council faces £113.5m deficit by 2028
An external review highlights significant financial risks, with nearly half of its recommendations rated nine out of ten.
The think-tank recommends that the Mayor of London be granted 2.3% of income tax and 0.8% of corporation tax generated within the city. This would provide City Hall with significantly more control over its financial resources and establish a direct revenue stream for funding development initiatives. The report identifies income tax as the primary component of this proposed local finance system, describing it as the "workhorse of the local finance system."
Corporation tax, while representing a smaller portion of local funding, would be exempt from equalisation processes. This exemption is intended to serve as an incentive for mayoral authorities to stimulate economic growth, as there would be no upper limit on the amount of corporation tax revenue that could be retained, capped at the proposed 0.8% share.
Oscar Selby, an analyst at Centre for Cities, stated that these changes would enable the mayor to "have much more control" over City Hall's finances. He added that any expansion of the local tax base, resulting from local economic development and pro-growth policies, would directly translate into increased resources for public transport, housing, and local services. This would reduce reliance on direct grants from central government and provide a guarantee for borrowing to fund new development projects.
Barnet homes face new 'mansion tax' if threshold lowered
Analysis suggests over 3,000 additional properties in the borough could be liable for the levy.
“We won’t see the mayor going cap in hand to the chancellor for new sources of revenue.”
Oscar Selby, analyst at Centre for Cities
Fiscal Devolution and Economic Growth
Bassam Mahfouz, Labour’s oversight spokesperson on the London Assembly, supported the calls for greater revenue-raising powers for London. He stated that while devolving more power to a local level is important, it is "meaningless" without the ability to raise the necessary funds. He believes that greater fiscal devolution should be a central part of any new devolution deal, allowing the GLA more control over investments in housing, transport, and public services, while also driving economic growth across the city.
The report also suggests a 'Swiss style' system for distributing funds among mayoral authorities, where a levy is placed on income tax revenue exceeding a defined threshold. This redistributed cash would ensure that less affluent areas are not disadvantaged. In London, a specific arrangement currently allocates 33% of business rates to central government, 37% to the GLA, and 30% to London boroughs. The Centre for Cities proposes that central government devolve its share to all mayoral strategic authorities, mirroring practices in the West Midlands and Greater Manchester.
The current centralised local finance system, which aims to equalise funding based on local need versus tax base, is seen by the report as penalising successful areas. As places become more prosperous and grow their tax base, they often see reductions in central government grants. The proposed recommendations aim to create a fiscal devolution system that offers a strong growth incentive in every mayoral strategic authority while guaranteeing a fair level of funding.
The report estimates that approximately £21.5 billion could be devolved to mayors over the four years leading up to 2030, assuming historical growth rates. London currently retains a small fraction of the taxes generated by its residents and businesses. A 2019 City Hall report indicated that London retains "barely 6% of all the tax paid by Londoners and businesses, compared to 50% in New York and 70% in Tokyo."
Currently, London contributes about £4 in every £10 of government revenue, with only 5% of all tax revenue raised in England remaining with mayors and local authorities, while 95% goes to central government. While significant tax-raising powers are unlikely under the current government, plans for an overnight visitor levy could allow mayors to generate millions by early 2028. This levy, expected not to exceed 5% in London, would be a percentage of accommodation costs.
What Happens Next
The proposals from the Centre for Cities are recommendations to government. It is unclear when or if these specific tax-sharing arrangements will be implemented. Discussions regarding devolution and potential new revenue streams, such as the overnight visitor levy, are ongoing.
Questions this report answers
+What is the Centre for Cities' main recommendation for mayoral authorities?
The Centre for Cities recommends replacing central government grants to mayoral authorities, like the Greater London Authority, with a system of income and corporation tax sharing. This would allow City Hall greater control over its budget and provide a direct source of revenue for development projects.
+How much income and corporation tax would the Mayor of London receive under the proposal?
The think-tank proposes giving the Mayor of London 2.3% of income tax and 0.8% of corporation tax raised in the city. This is intended to match the current grant funding while giving City Hall more autonomy over its finances.
+What is the aim of giving mayoral authorities more control over tax revenue?
The aim is to provide mayoral authorities with a stronger incentive for economic growth and ensure fairer funding. By directly linking local tax receipts to available resources, it encourages pro-growth policies that benefit public transport, housing, and local services.
+How does London's tax retention compare to other global cities?
London retains a significantly smaller percentage of the tax paid by its residents and businesses compared to other major global cities. A 2019 report indicated that London retains "barely 6% of all the tax paid by Londoners and businesses, compared to 50% in New York and 70% in Tokyo."
Barnet Press News Desk
This article was written at the Barnet Press news desk from the reporting of the outlets listed below it. Drafting is done by a language model under human editorial supervision — there is no reporter behind this byline, and we would rather say so than invent one.
How stories are produced and scoredWho runs Barnet PressCorrections
Barnet conditions
Loading live conditions…